getting diagram of initial state
getting diagram of goal state
Expanding nodes at depth 0
Expanding state 0
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 1
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 1
successfully verified the action of new state 1 with the path: The last action is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: `fast1` is at `n3`, `p2` is at `n3`, and `fast1` has capacity. The effects are correctly reflected: `p2` is on `fast1`, and the passenger count is updated. The current state's description and visualization are accurate and consistent with the actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 1 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 1
Expanding state 1
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 2
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 2
successfully verified the action of new state 2 with the path: The last action `(move-up-fast fast1 n3 n4)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 2 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 2
Expanding state 2
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 3
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 3
successfully verified the action of new state 3 with the path: The last action `(board p3 fast1 n4 n1 n2)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 3 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 3
Expanding state 3
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 4
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 4
successfully verified the action of new state 4 with the path: The last action `(move-up-fast fast1 n4 n5)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate, with all objects from the initial state present and correctly positioned.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 4 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 4
Expanding state 4
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 5
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Passenger p2's status is incorrect; it should be on floor n5, not inside fast1.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 5
successfully verified the action of new state 5 with the path: The last action `(leave p2 fast1 n5 n2 n1)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 5 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 5
Expanding state 5
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 6
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 6
successfully verified the action of new state 6 with the path: The last action `(leave p3 fast1 n5 n1 n0)` is valid as all preconditions are met in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action moves `p3` closer to the goal state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 6 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 6
Expanding state 6
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 7
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 7
successfully verified the action of new state 7 with the path: The last action `(board p5 fast1 n5 n0 n1)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate, showing `fast1` at `n5` with `p5` on board, aligning with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 7 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 7
Expanding state 7
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 8
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 8
successfully verified the action of new state 8 with the path: The last action `(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n0)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: `fast1` is at `n4`, `n0` is below `n4`, and `n0` is reachable by `fast1`. The current state's natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the effects of the action and the sequence of actions taken. All objects are correctly visualized, and their statuses are consistent with the actions performed.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 8 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 8
Expanding state 8
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 9
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 9
successfully verified the action of new state 9 with the path: The last action `(board p0 fast1 n4 n1 n2)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: `fast1` is at floor `n4`, `p0` is at floor `n4`, and `fast1` has the capacity to board `p0`. The effects are correctly reflected in the current state, with `p0` on board `fast1` and the capacity updated to 2/2. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 9 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 9
Expanding state 9
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 10
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 10
successfully verified the action of new state 10 with the path: The last action `(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n2)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 10 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 10
Expanding state 10
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 11
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 11
successfully verified the action of new state 11 with the path: The last action `(leave p0 fast1 n2 n2 n1)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately represent the current state, consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 11 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 11
Expanding state 11
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 12
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 12
successfully verified the action of new state 12 with the path: The action `(board p4 fast1 n2 n1 n2)` is valid because all preconditions are met: `fast1` is at floor `n2`, `p4` is at floor `n2`, and the elevator has capacity to board `p4`. The effects of the action are correctly reflected in the current state, with `p4` on board `fast1` and the capacity updated. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 12 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 12
Expanding state 12
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 13
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 13
successfully verified the action of new state 13 with the path: The action `(move-up-fast fast1 n2 n4)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: `fast1` is at `n2`, `n4` is above `n2`, and `n4` is reachable by `fast1`. The effects of the action are correctly reflected in the current state, with `fast1` at `n4` and the passengers on board. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization are all consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 13 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 13
Expanding state 13
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 14
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 14
successfully verified the action of new state 14 with the path: The last action `(leave p4 fast1 n4 n2 n1)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 14 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 14
Expanding state 14
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 15
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 15
successfully verified the action of new state 15 with the path: The action `(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n0)` is valid because all preconditions are met: `fast1` is at `n4`, `n0` is below `n4`, and `n0` is reachable by `fast1`. The effects of the action are correctly reflected in the current state, with `fast1` at `n0` and `p5` on board. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 15 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 15
Expanding state 15
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 16
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 16
successfully verified the action of new state 16 with the path: The last action `(leave p5 fast1 n0 n1 n0)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: `fast1` is at floor `n0`, `p5` is on board `fast1`, and the passenger count changes correctly. The current state's natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the effects of the action and the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 16 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 16
Found goal!!
['(board p2 fast1 n3 n0 n1)', '(move-up-fast fast1 n3 n4)', '(board p3 fast1 n4 n1 n2)', '(move-up-fast fast1 n4 n5)', '(leave p2 fast1 n5 n2 n1)', '(leave p3 fast1 n5 n1 n0)', '(board p5 fast1 n5 n0 n1)', '(move-down-fast fast1 n5 n4)', '(board p0 fast1 n4 n1 n2)', '(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n2)', '(leave p0 fast1 n2 n2 n1)', '(board p4 fast1 n2 n1 n2)', '(move-up-fast fast1 n2 n4)', '(leave p4 fast1 n4 n2 n1)', '(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n0)', '(leave p5 fast1 n0 n1 n0)']
Goal state and path diagrams recorded in <PATH_REMOVED>
(board p2 fast1 n3 n0 n1)
(move-up-fast fast1 n3 n4)
(board p3 fast1 n4 n1 n2)
(move-up-fast fast1 n4 n5)
(leave p2 fast1 n5 n2 n1)
(leave p3 fast1 n5 n1 n0)
(board p5 fast1 n5 n0 n1)
(move-down-fast fast1 n5 n4)
(board p0 fast1 n4 n1 n2)
(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n2)
(leave p0 fast1 n2 n2 n1)
(board p4 fast1 n2 n1 n2)
(move-up-fast fast1 n2 n4)
(leave p4 fast1 n4 n2 n1)
(move-down-fast fast1 n4 n0)
(leave p5 fast1 n0 n1 n0)
Goal state found.
